Translate

Top Ten Cities for arresting Americans


The top 10 cities where Americans were arrested and the number taken into custody:
1. Tijuana: 520
2. Guadalajara: 416
3. Nuevo Laredo: 359
4. London: 274
5. Mexico City: 208
6. Toronto: 183
7. Nassau, Bahamas: 108
8. MĆ©rida, Mexico: 99
9. Nogales, Mexico: 96
10. Hong Kong: 90

Arrests WorldWide (Drug Enforcement)

Arrests WorldWide (Drug Enforcement)

Subscribe via email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

2,500 citizens are arrested abroad. One third of the arrests are on drug-related charges. Many of those arrested assumed as U.S. citizens that they could not be arrested. From Asia to Africa, Europe to South America, citizens are finding out the hard way that drug possession or trafficking equals jail in foreign countries.
Disclaimer: The statements and articles listed here, and any opinions, are those of the writers alone, and neither are opinions of nor reflect the views of this Blog. Aggregated content created by others is the sole responsibility of the writers and its accuracy and completeness are not endorsed or guaranteed. This goes for all those links, too: Blogs have no control over the information you access via such links, does not endorse that information, cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided or any analysis based thereon, and shall not be responsible for it or for the consequences of your use of that information.

Over 3000 drug related posts search here

Drug Enforcement automatically monitors news articles and blog posts tracking breaking news of arrests and drug incidents as they happen worldwide .These inter-active News Reports are followed as they develop. Giving you the chance to comment on breaking stories as they happen. Drug Enforcement alerts you to topics that are frequently linked to and commented upon in the world press. Someone is arrested every 20 seconds for a drug related offense !Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post here. Comments are subject to the Blogspots terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the Drug Enforcement site. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed or all of their content blocked from viewing by other users without notification.

Subscriptions

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Comments:This is your opportunity to speak out about the story you just read. We encourage all readers to participate in this forum.Please follow our guidelines and do not post:Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo, such as accusing somebody of a crime, defaming someone's character, or making statements that can harm somebody's reputation.Obscene, explicit, or racist language.Personal attacks, insults, threats, harassment, or posting comments that incite violence.Comments using another person's real name to disguise your identity.Commercial product promotions.Comments unrelated to the story.Links to other Web sites.While we do not edit comments, we do reserve the right to remove comments that violate our code of conduct.If you feel someone has violated our posting guidelines please contact us immediately so we can remove the post. We appreciate your help in regulating our online community.
Drug Enforcement is pleased to provide a forum to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in newspapers and journals. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Readers Information

Reader uninitiated in blogs, the title of each post usually links to an original article from another source, be it newspaper or journal. Then text of the post consists of the posters comments and the comment button is for you to refer us to other interesting information or just to make a comment.
DISCLAIMER
Text may be subject to copyright.This blog does not claim copyright to any such text. Copyright remains with the original copyright holder
Drug Enforcement automatically monitors news articles and blog posts tracking breaking news of arrests and drug incidents as they happen worldwide .These inter-active News Reports are followed as they develop. Giving you the chance to comment on breaking stories as they happen. Drug Enforcement alerts you to topics that are frequently linked to and commented upon in the world press. Someone is arrested every 20 seconds for a drug related offense !Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post here. Comments are subject to the Blogspots terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of the Drug Enforcement site. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed or all of their content blocked from viewing by other users without notification.

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
DISCLAIMER:Text may be subject to copyright.This blog does not claim copyright to any such text. Copyright remains with the original copyright holder


Click Above

Thursday, March 6

John Hardy arrest warrant after he failed to show up for trial on drug charges.

An arrest warrant was issued Wednesday for John Hardy of Ingramport after he failed to show up for trial on drug charges.But the warrant won’t be acted upon until he returns from Thailand.Mr. Hardy, 50, and David Banfield, 42, of Upper Tantallon, were to begin a four-day trial in Amherst provincial court on drug charges. But Mr. Hardy’s lawyer, Jim O’Neil, told the court his client didn’t show up because of a miscommunication between himself and Mr. Hardy."He is working in the jungles of Asia," Mr. O’Neil said. "He lost track of the trial date because he was so used to me appearing on his behalf through a designation I received from him. He thought today’s (hearing) was for a motion and not for a trial."I accept responsibility for that. It was an honestly held misunderstanding on his part."Mr. Hardy won’t be back in Canada before July 8 because that is the earliest his company is willing to fly him out, Mr. O’Neil said, asking for an adjournment.Mr. Banfield’s lawyer, Mark Knox, asked that his client’s trial be postponed as well because it was essential this client’s defence to have Mr. Hardy present for the trial."I find it difficult to understand how someone could forget their trial date," Judge Carole Beaton said. "I do not want to make light of it, but it’s akin to a student telling his teacher that the ‘dog ate my homework.’ "Judge Beaton said Mr. Hardy bore some responsibility failing to appear.His absence put Mr. Banfield in a difficult position because "it would be prejudicial to his case if we were to go ahead today" without Mr. Hardy being present, she said.The case has been delayed several times since the charges were laid in 2005, and the judge said Mr. Hardy’s absence made it difficult for the court to find time for the trial.She set Oct. 7 to 10 as the new trial dates and ordered the arrest warrant. She ordered Mr. Hardy to appear for a pretrial conference in July and told Mr. O’Neil that "feast, famine, flood or insurrection by the Queen’s enemies" had better not keep Mr. Hardy from the pretrial conference or the new court dates.Mr. Hardy and Mr. Banfield were charged in October 2005 after the RCMP caught two people working a marijuana crop in Wentworth Valley. Police subsequently searched two Wentworth properties, where more than 1,000 plants were seized.The men face charges of possessing more than three kilograms of marijuana for the purpose of trafficking, producing marijuana and theft of less than $5,000 worth of electricity.

0 comments:

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Disclaimer: The statements and articles listed here, and any opinions, are those of the writers alone, and neither are opinions of nor reflect the views of this Blog. Aggregated content created by others is the sole responsibility of the writers and its accuracy and completeness are not endorsed or guaranteed. This goes for all those links, too: Blogs have no control over the information you access via such links, does not endorse that information, cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided or any analysis based thereon, and shall not be responsible for it or for the consequences of your use of that information.

  © Distributed by Blogger Templates. Blogger templates Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP